1. Souza JT, et al. Dysphagia and tube feeding after stroke are associated with poorer functional and mortality outcomes. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(7):2142–2149.
2. Zhang M, et al. Prevalence of Dysphagia in China: An Epidemiological Survey of 5943 Participants. Dysphagia. 2021;36(2):339–350.
3. Meng PP, et al. The Occurrence Rate of Swallowing Disorders After Stroke in Asia: A Meta-Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(11):105113.
4. U.S. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed. Label: ELIQUIS (apixaban) tablet, film coated. Bethesda, MD: NLM; 2023. Available from: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=fd383ae7-1e34-44ef-b8f1-ca6906dfbcef
5. Pfizer Inc; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. ELIQUIS® (apixaban) Prescribing Information. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2023.
6. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820.
7. Feigin VL, et al. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(1):18–29.
8. Surukonti SR, Surendrababu MS. Understanding Stress Testing Characteristics of Apixaban and Stability-Indicating Method Development. J AOAC Int. 2023;106(6):1565–1575.
9. Sato M, et al. Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model of Apixaban. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(3):382.
10. Bansal AK, et al. Solubility enhancement of BCS classified II/IV drug: solid dispersion of apixaban by solvent evaporation. Int J Drug Deliv. 2022;14(2):45–56.
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Considerations for the use of artificial intelligence to support regulatory decision-making for drug and biological products. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2025.
12. European Commission. EudraLex Volume 4: good manufacturing practice (GMP) guidelines – Chapter 4, Annex 11 and Annex 22. Brussels: European Commission; 2024.
13. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Considerations for the use of artificial intelligence to support regulatory decision-making for drug and biological products: guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD: CDER/CBER; 2025.
14. DrugBank Online. Apixaban (DB06605): uses, interactions, mechanism of action [Internet]. Edmonton: OMx Personal Health Analytics Inc; 2024. Available from: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB06605
15. Lip GYH, et al. Apixaban: A Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Review. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019;58(10):1253–1270.
16. Sarfraz RM, et al. Formulation and evaluation of mouth disintegrating tablets of atenolol and atorvastatin. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015;77(1):102–109.
17. Solaiman A, et al. Application of general multilevel factorial design with formulation of fast disintegrating tablets. Int J Pharm. 2016;501(1–2):31–41.
18. Mishra SM, Rohera BD. An integrated QbD approach for design, development and optimization of orodispersible tablet formulation of carbamazepine. Pharm Dev Technol. 2017;22(4):448–459.
19. Chinwala M. Recent Formulation Advances and Therapeutic Usefulness of Orally Disintegrating Tablets (ODTs). Pharmacy (Basel). 2020;8(4):186.
20. Khan AM, et al. ANN Approach to Predict an Optimized pH-Dependent Mesalamine Matrix Tablet. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:2637–2646.
21. Beg S, et al. QbD-based systematic development of novel optimized solid SNEDDS of lovastatin. Drug Deliv. 2015;22(6):765–784.
22. GMP-Compliance.org. Drafts of EU GMP Guideline Annex 11, Annex 22 and Chapter 4 released for comment [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.gmp-compliance.org/gmp-news/drafts-of-eu-gmp-guideline-annex-11-annex-22-and-chapter-4-released-for-comment
23. Patel H, et al. QbD Approach for Development of Co-Processed Excipient Pellets by Extrusion-Spheronization. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2016;10(2):141–151.
24. World Health Organization. Mortality and global health estimates. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates
25. Sporns PB, et al. Childhood stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):12.
26. Krishnamurthi RV, et al. Global, Regional and Country-Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: GBD 2017. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):118–128.
27. Prokopiv MM, et al. Prospective analysis of cerebrovascular disease epidemiology in Kyiv, Ukraine. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(11):2713–2718.
28. Amoah D, et al. An international perspective on young stroke incidence and risk factors: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1678.
29. Perera KS, et al. Evaluating Rates of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Among Young Adults: The Young ESUS Cohort Study. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(4):382–391.
30. Beslow LA, et al. Paediatric Ischemic Stroke: An Infrequent Complication of SARS-CoV-2. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(4):657–665.
31. Beslow LA, et al. International Prevalence and Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 in Childhood Arterial Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2022;53(6):1934–1942.
32. Terré R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Rev Neurol. 2020;71(6):205–215.
33. Patita M, et al. Endoscopic gastrostomy for nutritional support in post-stroke dysphagia. Nutr Hosp. 2022;39(1):1–8.
34. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem compound summary for CID 10182969: apixaban [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: NCBI; 2024. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Apixaban
35. Islam MS, et al. Enhanced aqueous dissolution of hydrophobic apixaban via direct incorporation of hydrophilic nanographene oxide. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;216:112512.
36. Alexander SPH, et al. Apixaban. IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY [Internet]. Edinburgh: International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology; 2024. Available from: https://www.guidetopharmacology.org/GRAC/LigandDisplayForward?ligandId=6390
37. Rathod S, et al. Analytical and pharmaceutical consideration of the anticoagulant drug apixaban: a comprehensive review. Int J Pharm Sci. 2023;13(4):1–15.
38. Kalyankar P, et al. Formulation Design and Optimization of Orodispersible Tablets of Quetiapine Fumarate by Sublimation Method. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015;77(4):450–455.
39. Dave V, et al. Novel approach of aceclofenac fast dissolving tablet. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015;28(1 Suppl):281–287.
40. Zimmer Ł, et al. Dissolution properties and kinetic study of sulfadimidine and trimethoprim tablets containing superdisintegrants. Acta Pol Pharm. 2015;72(6):1213–1222.
41. Singh J, et al. Enhancement of solubility of lamotrigine by solid dispersion and development of orally disintegrating tablets using 3(2) full factorial design. J Pharm. 2015;2015:828453.
42. Yu D, Hoag SW. Impact of diluents on compaction, dissolution, and physical stability of amorphous solid dispersion tablets. Int J Pharm. 2024;652:123924.
43. Ortega CA, et al. New Orodispersible Mini Tablets of Enalapril Maleate by Direct Compression for Paediatric Patients. Curr Drug Deliv. 2020;17(6):540–550.
44. Kádár S, et al. Bioequivalence prediction with small-scale biphasic dissolution and dissolution-permeation apparatus. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2024;197:106782.
45. Bansal S, et al. QbD-Oriented Development and Characterization of Effervescent Floating-Bioadhesive Tablets of Cefuroxime Axetil. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2016;17(1):85–101.
46. European Medicines Agency. Eliquis (apixaban): European Public Assessment Report [Internet]. Amsterdam: EMA; 2023. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/eliquis
47. Conceição J, et al. Orodispersible Carbamazepine/Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Tablets Obtained by Direct Compression. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(1):36.
48. Tashan E, et al. Development of Nanocrystal Ziprasidone Orally Disintegrating Tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(5):151.
49. Zhang Y, et al. Development and optimization of levodopa and benzylhydrazine orally disintegrating tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2020;46(1):25–34.
50. Iqbal H, et al. Formulation development and optimization studies of mouth dissolving tablets of tizanidine HCl. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2020;33(2):619–625.
51. Gavan A, et al. Fluidised bed granulation of two APIs: QbD approach and NIR in-line monitoring. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2021;16(1):93–105.
52. Patil K, et al. Quality-by-Design-Driven Nanostructured Lipid Scaffold of Apixaban. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(7):910.
53. Namjoshi S, et al. Quality by Design: Development of the QTPP for Semisolid Topical Products. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(3):287.
54. Khan H, et al. Multi-object optimization of Navy-blue anodic oxidation via response surface models. Chemosphere. 2022;287(Pt 2):132818.
55. Belayneh A, et al. Formulation and Optimization of Monolithic Fixed-Dose Combination of Metformin HCl and Glibenclamide Orodispersible Tablets. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2020;2020:3546597.
56. Damiati SA. Digital pharmaceutical sciences. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(6):206.
57. Simões MF, et al. Artificial neural networks applied to quality-by-design. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020;153:116–134.
58. Xia CY, et al. Real time release testing of disintegration time of uncoated Tianshu Tablets. China J Chin Materia Med. 2020;45(7):1547–1552.
59. Mészáros LA, et al. Real-time release testing of in vitro dissolution and blend uniformity by NIR spectroscopy and machine vision. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2024;200:114368.
60. Alexandra Mészáros L, et al. Machine vision-based non-destructive dissolution prediction of meloxicam-containing tablets. Int J Pharm. 2024;655:124013.
61. Zhang W, et al. Intelligent information management enables quality-by-design in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):8742.
62. Lambrinidis G, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A. Multi-objective optimization methods in novel drug design. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2021;16(5):561–572.
63. Gong D, et al. A Meta-Objective Approach for Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimization. Evol Comput. 2019;27(1):1–26.
64. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. M8 Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) v4.0. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2021.
65. International Council for Harmonisation. Guideline for Module 1 of the electronic Common Technical Document (M4) – Regulatory Information. ICH; 2022.
66. European Medicines Agency. Artificial intelligence [Internet]. Amsterdam: EMA; 2024. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/about-us/how-we-work/data-regulation-big-data-other-sources/artificial-intelligence
67. Patel S, et al. DE-INTERACT: A machine-learning-based predictive tool for drug-excipient interaction. Int J Pharm. 2023;636:122839.
68. Zhang F, et al. Ensemble Learning Based on Policy Optimization Neural Networks for Capability Assessment. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(17):5802.
69. Ondracka A, et al. CPV of the Future: AI-Powered Continued Process Verification. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2022;76(6):537–551.
70. European Medicines Agency. Apixaban product-specific bioequivalence guidance [Internet]. Amsterdam: EMA; 2022. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/apixaban-product-specific-bioequivalence-guidance
71. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Apixaban film-coated tablet 2.5 and 5 mg product-specific bioequivalence guidance [Internet]. Canberra: TGA; 2022. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resources/international-scientific-guidelines-adopted-australia/apixaban-film-coated-tablet-25-and-5-mg-product-specific-bioequivalence-guidance-0
72. Patil VM, et al. Design and evaluation of oral formulation for apixaban. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2023;24(7):192.
73. World Health Organization. WHO Technical Report Series No. 1033: Annex 4 – WHO guideline on data integrity. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
74. Hu Y, et al. Ensuring data integrity in the pharmaceutical lifecycle. Talanta. 2025;283:127045.
75. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures – Scope and Application. Guidance for Industry. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2003.
76. Tran R, et al. A network of regulatory innovations to improve FDA quality assessments. Int J Pharm X. 2024;7:100239.
77. Ruiz-Picazo A, et al. Effect of thickener on disintegration, dissolution and permeability of common drug products for elderly patients. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020;153:6–13.
78. de Freitas Neto JL, et al. Development of Paediatric Orodispersible Tablets Based on Efavirenz. Curr HIV Res. 2020;18(4):269–280.
79. Durand M, et al. Effectiveness and safety among direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(6):2535–2553.
80. Subramanian VB, et al. Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for determination of impurities in apixaban tablet dosage forms. Biomed Chromatogr. 2020;34(2):e4719.
81. Zarmpi P, et al. Biopharmaceutical implications of excipient variability on drug dissolution from immediate release products. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020;154:195–209.
82. Mansuri N, et al. Quality by design (QbD) approach to match tablet glossiness. Pharm Dev Technol. 2020;25(7):861–870.
83. Liu H, et al. Optimization of the manufacturing process of a complex amphotericin B liposomal formulation using quality by design approach. Int J Pharm. 2020;586:119473.
84. Farooqi S, et al. QbD-Based Numerical and Graphical Optimization Technique for the Development of Osmotic Pump Controlled-Release Metoclopramide HCl Tablets. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:5599–5616.
85. Lamberti G, et al. Quality by Digital Design for accelerated sustainable nanomedicine. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2025;204:107239.
86. Chakraborty S, et al. Leveraging artificial intelligence for advancements in liquid dosage formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(10):1285.
87. Li H, et al. Scale-agnostic models based on dimensionless quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Pharmaceutics. 2025;18(7):1033.
88. Müller JA, Brock D, Knapp B. Bioprocessing 4.0: a pragmatic review and future perspectives. Digit Discov. 2024;3(8):1509–1528.
89. European Medicines Agency; U.S. Food and Drug Administration. EMA and FDA set common principles for AI in medicine development. EMA News. 2024.
90. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-practice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles
91. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guiding principles of good AI practice in drug development [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2024. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/artificial-intelligence-drug-development/guiding-principles-good-ai-practice-drug-development
92. International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering. AI algorithm qualification: a quality by design lens on regulatory expectations. Pharm Eng. 2024.
93. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Q8, Q9 and Q10 questions and answers – appendix: QAs from training sessions on Q8, Q9, Q10 points to consider. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2012.
94. Singh R, et al. Regulatory perspectives for AI/ML implementation in pharmaceutical GMP settings. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1384562.