Abstract View

Author(s): Govind Yadav*1, Madhuri Dubey2

Email(s): 1govindyadav20052000@gmail.com

Address:

    Sarswati Higher Education & Technical College of Pharmacy, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow.

Published In:   Volume - 4,      Issue - 10,     Year - 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.71431/IJRPAS.2025.41010  

 View HTML        View PDF

Please allow Pop-Up for this website to view PDF file.

ABSTRACT:
The present research aimed to design, formulate, and evaluate mucoadhesive buccal tablets of Loratadine using Pithecellobium dulce (Manila Tamarind) seed powder as a novel natural polymer. Loratadine, a BCS Class II antihistaminic drug, exhibits poor aqueous solubility and undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, leading to reduced oral bioavailability. Buccal drug delivery offers a promising alternative by avoiding gastrointestinal degradation and hepatic metabolism, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficiency and improving patient compliance. Seven formulations (F1–F7) were prepared by direct compression using varying concentrations of P. dulce gum along with MCC, ethyl cellulose, magnesium stearate, and talc. The tablets were evaluated for pre- and post-compression parameters, swelling index, mucoadhesive strength, FTIR compatibility, in vitro drug release, drug release kinetics, and stability studies. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences between batches (p<0.05). Among all formulations, F5 exhibited optimal characteristics with swelling index of 35.82 ± 0.38%, mucoadhesive strength of 10.40 ± 1.13 g, and drug release of 98.16 ± 1.77% over 8 h. The release profile followed Korsmeyer–Peppas kinetics, indicating non-Fickian diffusion. FTIR spectra confirmed drug–polymer compatibility, and stability studies over 3 months indicated no significant changes in drug content or physical characteristics. This study demonstrates that P. dulce gum can serve as an effective natural mucoadhesive polymer for the sustained buccal delivery of Loratadine [1–3]. confirm the potential of P. dulce gum as a safe and effective natural mucoadhesive polymer for sustained buccal delivery of Loratadine.

Cite this article:
Design and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablets of Loratadine Using Manila Tamarind Seed Powder. IJRPAS, October 2025; 4(10): 139-147.DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71431/IJRPAS.2025.41010


  1. Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery system: an overview. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2007; 69(4):460–467.
  2. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 1998; 1(1):15–30.
  3. Bhatt D, Kumar M. Natural polymers in drug delivery systems. J Pharm Innov. 2020; 15(3):250–259.
  4. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, and Flower RJ. Pharmacology. 8th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2016. p. 203–205.
  5. Gandhi RB, Robinson JR. Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1994; 13(1–2):43–74.
  6. Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009; 71(3):505–518.
  7. Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005; 57(11):1556–1568.
  8. Singh K, Verma A. Manila tamarind gum as a natural mucoadhesive polymer. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021; 167:1344–1352.
  9. Sweetman SC. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. 38th ed. Pharmaceutical Press; 2020. p. 1456–1457.
  10. Vamshi VY, Chandrasekar K, Ramesh G. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of carvedilol. Curr Drug Delivery 2007; 4:27–39.
  11. Peddapalli H, Bakshi V, Boggula N. Formulation, in vitro and ex vivo characterization of mucoadhesive buccal tablets for an antihypertensive drug. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2018; 11:402-11.
  12. Balaji A, Radhika V, Goud V. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets by using natural polymer. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5:4699-708.
  13. Desai KG, Kumar TM. Preparation and evaluation of a novel buccal adhesive system. AAPS PharmSciTech 2004; 5:1-9.
  14. Bhanja S, Ellaiah P, Mohanty C, Murthy KVR, Panigrahi B, Padhy S. Design and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of perindopril prepared by sintering technique. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2010; 3:1-10.
  15. Charde S, Mudgal M, Kumar L, Saha R. Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive controlled-release tablets of lercanidipine. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008; 9:182–90.
  16. Naga Rajau K, Velmurgan S, Deepika B, Sundar V. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of buccal tablets of metoprolol tartrate. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2011; 3:239-46.
  17. Chinna Reddy P, Ramesh G, Shravan Y, Vamshi VY, Yamsani MR. Development of bioadhesive buccal tablets for felodipine and pioglitazone in combined dosage form: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo characterization. Drug Delivery 2011; 18:344–52.
  18. Reddy KA, Venugopal K. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of buccal tablets of piroxicam. Int J Chem Sci 2012; 10(1):399-412.
  19. Inampudi A, Adimoolam S, Bhosale R, Vantoor BNS. Formulation and evaluation of vanlafaxine hydrochloride mucoadhesive buccal tablets. Int Res J Pharm 2012;3(1):226-31.
  20. Barhate SD, Patel KM, Lokhande GS. Formulation and evaluation of buccoadhesive tablet of atenolol. Der Pharmacia Lettre 2011; 3(2):34-8.
  21. Bhaskar U, Rudragouda P, Ravindra B, Swati M, Siddramesh B, Dhananjay A. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of Furosemide. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2012; 1(3):1041-63.
  22. Chaudhari VA, Sarode SM, Sathe BS, Vadnere GP. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablet of Flurbiprofen. World J Pharm Pharma Sci 2014;3(5):945-62
  23. Latheeshjlal L, Sunil A., Abdhul M, Vaidya MJ. Formulation and Development of Buccal Drug Delivery System containing Curcumin. Int J Pharm Tech Res 2011; 3(1):37-41.
  24. Shivanand K, Raju SA, Nizamuddin S, Jayakar B. In-vivo bioavailability studies of sumatriptan succinate buccal tablets. DARU J Pharm Sci 2011;19(3):224-30.
  25. Acholu PK, Yajaman S, Jayaveera KN. Ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation of formulated novel felodipine core in cup buccal tablets. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci2014;4(38):35-40.
  26. Ceschel GC, Maffei P, Lombardi BS and Ronchi C. Design and evaluation of buccal adhesive hydrocortisone acetate (HCA) tablets. Drug Deliv. 2001; 8(3): 161 - 171.
  27. Varshosaz J and Dehghan Z. Development and characterization of buccoadhesive nifedipine tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2002; 54(2): 135 – 141

Related Images:



Recent Images



Neurological Complications among Pregnant and Post Partum Mothers in a Private Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Review on Regulatory Affairs in Pharmaceutical Industry
Cucumber and Mint Soap: Preparation and Evaluation
Topical Delivery in Cosmetics: Enhancing Penetration and Bioavailability
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Soap
Gelatin: A Widely Used Pharmaceutical Excipient
Therapeutic insights into Saroglitazar: a dual PPAR- α/γ agonist targeting diabetic dyslipidaemia and NAFLD
A Comprehensive Review on Dyslipidemia and Obesity: Pathophysiology, Clinical Implications and Management Approaches
Antidiabetic Herbs and Polyherbal Antidiabetic Formulations –An Overview
Review on Clinical Research and Clinical Trials

Tags