Formulation and Evaluation of
Quercetin Nanoemulsion Gel for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Mamaniyat Samiha Mahmad*,
Mahek Gani Deshmukh, Khan Muklisa Aslam, Afira Aabeda Mohammad Naseem
JIIU’s Ali Allana College of
Pharmacy, Akkalkuwa, Dist: Nandurbar, Maharashtra, India
*Correspondence: mamaniyatsamiha786@gmail.com;
DOI: https://doi.org/10.71431/IJRPAS.2026.5612
|
Article
Information
|
|
Abstract
|
|
Research Article
Received: 13/06/2026
Accepted:
19/06/2026
Published:30/06/2026
Keywords
Quercetin; Nanoemulsion Gel; Rheumatoid Arthritis;
|
|
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic
autoimmune disease causing joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and joint damage.
Conventional drugs like Non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs,
Corticosteroids, and Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs may cause systemic
side effects with long-term use. Quercetin has strong anti-inflammatory and
antioxidant properties but limited bioavailability. A nanoemulsion gel was
developed to improve its solubility, skin penetration, and controlled drug
release for topical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Evaluation showed good
physicochemical properties, suggesting it as a promising topical delivery
system.
|
INTRODUCTION
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
is a chronic, systemic autoimmune disease that causes progressive cartilage
degradation, bone erosion, pain, and functional impairment. Persistent
inflammation of synovial joints is the hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis
(RA)[4,5].About 0.5–1% of people worldwide are affected, and it considerably
lowers quality of life while raising the cost of healthcare[3,4]. Tumour
necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)
are among the pro-inflammatory cytokines that are released as a result of the
disease's complex immunological mechanisms, which involve the activation of T
cells, B cells, and macrophages. These cytokines are crucial in the degradation
of joints[5].
Current pharmacological treatments for RA,
such as corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and
disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), are linked to a number of
drawbacks, including organ toxicity, immunosuppression, gastrointestinal
irritation, and negative long-term effects. Additionally, systemic
administration frequently results in decreased patient compliance and
non-specific drug distribution. These drawbacks emphasise the need for safer
and more potent alternative treatment approaches[4].
Quercetin
due to its strong anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory
qualities, a naturally occurring flavonoid found in many fruits and vegetables,
has been the subject of much research[6,7]. It scavenges free radicals,
inhibits lipid peroxidation, suppresses the production of inflammatory
cytokines, and modifies signalling pathways like nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)
to achieve its pharmacological effects[6,7]. Because of these characteristics, quercetin is a
potentially effective treatment for inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid
arthritis[8].
However, quercetin's poor aqueous
solubility, low bioavailability, quick metabolism, and restricted permeability
across biological membranes severely restrict its clinical use. To improve its
therapeutic efficacy, these difficulties call for the creation of sophisticated
drug delivery systems[10,11]. Nanoemulsion-based drug delivery systems have
become one of the most successful methods for increasing the solubility,
stability, and bioavailability of medications that are poorly soluble in water.
With droplet sizes usually in the nanometre range, nanoemulsions—isotropic,
thermodynamically stable systems made of oil, water, surfactant, and
co-surfactant—offer increased surface area and better drug absorption[12,13].
Additionally, topical drug delivery
systems minimise systemic side effects and improve therapeutic outcomes by
delivering the medication directly to the site of inflammation, which is a
major advantage in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Viscosity,
spreadability, and patient acceptability are improved when nanoemulsion is
incorporated into a gel base (nanoemulgel), making it appropriate for dermal
application. This combination offers controlled and prolonged drug release in
addition to enhancing drug penetration through the skin[15,20].
|
Components
|
Function
|
Quantity (F1)
|
Quantity
(F2)
|
Quantity
(F3)
|
|
Quercetin
|
Drug
|
0.50
g
|
0.50
g
|
0.50
g
|
|
Oleic
acid
|
Oil
phase
|
10.25
ml
|
12.2
ml
|
11.4
ml
|
|
Tween
80
|
Surfactant
|
17.3
ml
|
15.8
ml
|
16.5
ml
|
|
Propylene
glycol
|
Co-surfactant
|
8.6
ml
|
7.9
ml
|
8.2
ml
|
|
Carbopol
934
|
Gelling
agent
|
1
gm
|
1
gm
|
1
gm
|
|
Distilled
water
|
Aqueous
Phase
|
13.75
ml
|
14.1
ml
|
13.7ml
|
In order to effectively treat rheumatoid
arthritis topically, the current study focuses on the development and
assessment of a quercetin-loaded nanoemulsion gel. The developed formulation
seeks to increase quercetin's bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy while
overcoming the drawbacks of traditional therapy. The formulation's suitability
for topical application was assessed using a number of physicochemical
parameters, such as pH, spreadability, drug content, and stability[1,2,23].
METHODOLOGY
1
Pseudo-ternary Phase Diagram
Construction :-
·
To identify the nanoemulsion region and
optimize the oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant ratio, a pseudo-ternary phase
diagram was created.
·
Solubility studies were used to choose the
appropriate oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant (without adding the medication).
·
To create Smix, surfactant and
co-surfactant were combined in various proportions :-
a.
1:1
b.
2:1
c.
3:1
d.
4:1
·
Various volume ratios of oil and Smix were
combined :-
1)
1:9
2)
2:8
3)
3:7
4)
4:6
5)
5:5
6)
6:4
7)
7:3
8)
8:2
9)
9:1
·
With constant stirring, each mixture was
gradually titrated with deionized water.
·
The clarity and turbidity of the mixtures
were visually assessed.
·
To determine the nanoemulsion region, the findings
were displayed on a pseudo-ternary phase diagram.
·
The final oil-in-water (O/W) nanoemulsion
with HLB range 8–18 was prepared using the Smix ratio that generated the
biggest clear monophasic nanoemulsion area[12,13].
2
Preparation of Nanoemulsion :-
·
In the oil phase, quercetin was dissolved.
·
Smix was created by combining surfactant
with co-surfactant.
·
Smix was given an oil phase.
·
Stirring, distilled water was gradually
added.
·
To create the nanoemulsion, high-speed
homogenization was used(10,12).
3
Preparation of Nanoemulsion gel :-
·
After being dissolved in distilled water,
carbopol 934 was left to swell.
·
The gel basis was mixed with nanoemulsion.
·
To change the pH and create gel,
triethanolamine was used.
·
As a preservative, methyl paraben was
added.
·
To create a homogenous nanoemulsion gel,
the mixture was agitated[15,20].
Pseudo-ternary
Phase Diagram
|
Evaluation Parameters :-
1. Phytochemical
tests[21,22] :-
|
Sr.
No.
|
Phytochemical Group
|
Test
|
Observation
|
Result
|
|
1
|
Flavonoids
|
Shinoda
test
|
Pink/red
coloration
|
Present
(+)
|
|
2
|
Flavonoids
|
Alkaline
reagent test
|
Yellow color disappears on adding acid
|
Present
(+)
|
|
3
|
Flavonoids
|
Lead
acetate test
|
Yellow
precipitate
|
Present
(+)
|
|
4
|
Flavonoids
|
Sulfuric
acid test
|
Yellow/orange
coloration
|
Present
(+)
|
|
5
|
Phenolic
compounds
|
Ferric
chloride test
|
Greenish/blue
coloration
|
Present
(+)
|
|
6
|
Alkaloids
|
Dragendorff’s
test
|
No
orange precipitate
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
7
|
Alkaloids
|
Mayer’s
test
|
No
cream precipitate
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
8
|
Alkaloids
|
Wagner’s
test
|
No
brown precipitate
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
9
|
Glycosides
|
Borntrager’s
test
|
No
pink/red color
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
10
|
Tannins
|
Gelatin
test
|
No
precipitate
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
11
|
Saponins
|
Foam
test
|
No
stable foam
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
12
|
Carbohydrates
|
Molisch
test
|
No
violet ring
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
13
|
Proteins
|
Biuret
test
|
No
violet color
|
Absent
(–)
|
|
14
|
Steroids/ Triterpenoids
|
Liebermann–Burchard
test
|
No
green coloration
|
Absent
(–)
|
2.
Evaluation of Quercetin
Nanoemulsion Gel :-
I.
Physical Appearance :-
a.
Colour :- Light yellow or pale
yellow
b.
Homogeneity :- Lump-free,
uniform
c.
Consistency :- semi-solid and
smooth
d.
Clarity :- Uniform and
slightly translucent
e.
Particles :- No particles are
visible[1,2,15].
II.
pH :-
·
Method :-
§ One gram of gel should be weighed and then dissolved in ten
milliliters of distilled water.
§ Give it two hours to stand.
§ Use a digital pH meter that has been calibrated to measure pH.
·
Acceptable Range :- 5.5 to 7.0[23]
III.
Spreadability :-
·
Method :-
§ One gram of gel should be sandwiched between two glass slides.
§ Use the 500 g standard weight.
§ Calculate how long it takes to separate.
§ Use the following formula
to determine spreadability.
S = (M × L) / T
where ,
S stands for spreadability.
M is the weight attached to
the top slide.
L stands for slide length.
T stands for time spent.
·
Acceptable Range :- 5–8
g·cm/sec[15]
IV.
Drug Content Uniformity
:-
·
Method :-
§ Weigh one gram of gel, then dissolve it in methanol.
§ After 15 minutes of sonication, filter.
§ Use a UV spectrophotometer set to 370 nm for analysis.
·
Acceptable Range :- 90–110%[1,2]
RESULT
In
order to create an optimum formulation with desired physicochemical and
performance properties, three quercetin nanoemulsion gel formulations (F1, F2,
and F3) were successfully developed.
A number of evaluation criteria, such as appearance, pH, viscosity,
spreadability, drug content were applied to all three formulations. The results
showed discernible changes across the formulations, mostly as a result of
variances in excipient content and composition.
Formulation F1 had better qualities than Formulations F2 and F3. The
nanoemulsion system's stability was demonstrated by its homogeneous, smooth
appearance and lack of phase separation. F1's pH was found to be within the
permissible range for skin compatibility, indicating that it could be used
topically without causing irritation.
Formulation F1 was deemed the optimal
batch based on the overall evaluation results because of its superior
stability, physicochemical features. Therefore, F1 can be considered a
promising formulation for quercetin topical administration.
|
Test
|
Observation
|
Result
(F1)
|
Result
(F2)
|
Result
(F3)
|
|
Physical Appearance :-
a.
Colour
b.
Homogeneity
c.
Consistency
d.
Clarity
e.
Particles
|
a.
Pake yellow
b.
Smooth and uniform
c.
Semi-solid, smooth
texture
d.
Slightly translucent
e.
No particles observed
|
Acceptable
|
Acceptable
|
Acceptable
|
|
pH
|
5-6.5
|
5.59
|
8.65
|
9.45
|
|
Spreadability
|
5 – 8 g.cm/sec
|
8
|
7
|
7.3
|
|
Drug Content Uniformity
|
90-110 % drug content
|
98.1 %
|
100. 7%
|
99.3 %
|
CONCLUSION
The study showed that a gel based on
quercetin nanoemulsion is a promising topical formulation for the treatment of
rheumatoid arthritis. Quercetin's solubility, stability, and skin penetration
are all greatly improved by the nanoemulsion system.
The formulation had an acceptable pH, good
spreadability, high drug content, and improved skin penetration, according to
evaluation results. Additionally, the nanoemulsion gel demonstrated strong
physical stability.
With fewer systemic side effects and
better patient compliance, quercetin nanoemulgel can be regarded as a
successful alternative treatment for rheumatoid arthritis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to express my special
gratitude to Dr. G. J. Khan, Principal, JIIU'S Ali Allana College of Pharmacy
Akkalkuwa and Management of Jamia Islamia Ishaatul Uloom Akkalkuwa for their
continuous motivation and providing all necessary facilities during completion
of this work.
REFERENCES
1.
Aulton ME, Taylor K. Aulton’s Pharmaceutics: The Design and
Manufacture of Medicines. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2018.
2.
Sinko PJ. Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical
Sciences. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
3.
Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA,
et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis. Arthritis Rheum.
2008;58(1):26-35.
4.
Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet.
2016;388(10055):2023-2038.
5.
McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis.
N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2205-2219.
6.
Boots AW, Haenen GR, Bast A. Health effects of quercetin. Eur J
Pharmacol. 2008;585:325-337.
7.
Li Y, Yao J, Han C, Yang J, Chaudhry MT, Wang S, et al.
Quercetin, inflammation and immunity. Nutrients. 2016;8(3):167.
8.
Parveen R, Baboota S, Ali J, Ahuja A, Vasudev SS, Ahmad S. Oil
based nanocarrier for improved delivery of quercetin. J Nanopart Res.
2011;13:5111-5123.
9.
Hosny KM, Banjar ZM. Nanoemulsion formulations for topical
delivery. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2013;3(9):114-118.
10.
Shakeel F, Ramadan W, Alsarra IA. Nanoemulsions as vehicles for
drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2009;379:1-7.
11.
Tadros T, Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Solans C. Formation and
stability of nanoemulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;108:303-318.
12.
Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Nanoemulsions: properties
and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12:2826-2841.
13.
Solans C, Izquierdo P, Nolla J, Azemar N, Garcia-Celma MJ.
Nano-emulsions review. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;10:102-110.
14.
Patel MR, Patel RB, Parikh JR, Bhatt KK, Patel BG. Formulation
variables in nanoemulsion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2011;37:671-680.
15.
Kumar R, Singh B, Bakshi G. Nanoemulsion gel for topical
delivery. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2017;8(1):1-10.
16.
Shah P, Bhalodia D, Shelat P. Nanoemulsion: review on
formulation and applications. Syst Rev Pharm. 2010;1(1):24-32.
17.
Date AA, Nagarsenker MS. Design and evaluation of
microemulsions. Int J Pharm. 2007;329:166-172.
18.
Ghosh PK, Murthy RS. Microemulsions in drug delivery. Curr Drug
Deliv. 2006;3:167-180.
19.
Yadav SK, Mishra MK, Tiwari A, Shukla A. Emulsion-based systems
for drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;33:233-246.
20.
Alam P, Shakeel F, Anwer MK, Foudah AI, Alqarni MH. Nanoemulsion-based
gel for transdermal delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43(3):1-9.
21.
Khadabadi SS, Deore SL, Baviskar BA. Experimental
Phytopharmacognosy: A Comprehensive Guide. Pune: Nirali Prakashan; p. 3.6–3.8.
22.
Khandelwal KR, Sethi VK. Practical Pharmacognosy: Techniques and
Experiments. Pune: Nirali Prakashan; p. 25.6–25.8..
23.
Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. India Pharmacopoeia 2022. Vol.
1-4. Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare, Government of India;2022.